<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging Conference Sessions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clioweb.org/2006/10/25/blogging-conference-sessions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clioweb.org/2006/10/25/blogging-conference-sessions/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:14:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Boggs</title>
		<link>http://clioweb.org/2006/10/25/blogging-conference-sessions/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Boggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 19:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clioweb.org/archive/2006/10/25/blogging-conference-sessions/#comment-331</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t expect wireless internet access at the AHA this year, or in the next few years. I&#039;ve always felt that the academic conference I&#039;ve attended have a kind of &quot;closed door&quot; feel to them. I&#039;m not even sure what the etiquette is for blogging an academic conference. Is it OK for me to take notes on someone&#039;s paper and publish them, along with my thoughts?

This stands in STARK contrast to tech/web developments conferences and workshops. Stuff on them is out EVERYWHERE. And it&#039;s fantastic stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t expect wireless internet access at the AHA this year, or in the next few years. I&#8217;ve always felt that the academic conference I&#8217;ve attended have a kind of &#8220;closed door&#8221; feel to them. I&#8217;m not even sure what the etiquette is for blogging an academic conference. Is it OK for me to take notes on someone&#8217;s paper and publish them, along with my thoughts?</p>
<p>This stands in STARK contrast to tech/web developments conferences and workshops. Stuff on them is out EVERYWHERE. And it&#8217;s fantastic stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://clioweb.org/2006/10/25/blogging-conference-sessions/#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clioweb.org/archive/2006/10/25/blogging-conference-sessions/#comment-330</guid>
		<description>You should try out the Performancing extension for Firefox. http://performancing.com/firefox</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should try out the Performancing extension for Firefox. <a href="http://performancing.com/firefox" rel="nofollow">http://performancing.com/firefox</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://clioweb.org/2006/10/25/blogging-conference-sessions/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clioweb.org/archive/2006/10/25/blogging-conference-sessions/#comment-329</guid>
		<description>Actually, I&#039;ve been thinking a bit lately about how we humanists lag woefully behind the geek folks in our technological conference practices. Not only have I never seen a decent backchannel going at any of the academic conferences I regularly attend, you can&#039;t even count on wireless access (as noted above). Seems like there&#039;s a deep failure in professional associations in understanding the potential of augmenting the conference space with an on-site virtual layer...not sure how to start fixing that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I&#8217;ve been thinking a bit lately about how we humanists lag woefully behind the geek folks in our technological conference practices. Not only have I never seen a decent backchannel going at any of the academic conferences I regularly attend, you can&#8217;t even count on wireless access (as noted above). Seems like there&#8217;s a deep failure in professional associations in understanding the potential of augmenting the conference space with an on-site virtual layer&#8230;not sure how to start fixing that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherah</title>
		<link>http://clioweb.org/2006/10/25/blogging-conference-sessions/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clioweb.org/archive/2006/10/25/blogging-conference-sessions/#comment-328</guid>
		<description>Definitely don&#039;t count on wireless access. But I like the idea of you blogging from the conference, since I will not be attending.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely don&#8217;t count on wireless access. But I like the idea of you blogging from the conference, since I will not be attending.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sepoy</title>
		<link>http://clioweb.org/2006/10/25/blogging-conference-sessions/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>sepoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clioweb.org/archive/2006/10/25/blogging-conference-sessions/#comment-327</guid>
		<description>Snark: The only way to blog a panel. Even if you like one paper, you will hate others. Or you should. If you like all the papers on the panel, what is wrong with you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snark: The only way to blog a panel. Even if you like one paper, you will hate others. Or you should. If you like all the papers on the panel, what is wrong with you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Boggs</title>
		<link>http://clioweb.org/2006/10/25/blogging-conference-sessions/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Boggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 01:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clioweb.org/archive/2006/10/25/blogging-conference-sessions/#comment-326</guid>
		<description>Good point, John. I don&#039;t expect internet access this weekend, and the AHA usually hasn&#039;t had wireless available (though they have a room set aside for internet access.)

I tend to hand-code my blog posts in TextMate before I put them in WordPress. Very inefficient. I&#039;ve been meaning to try &lt;a href=&quot;http://ranchero.com/marsedit/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MarsEdit&lt;/a&gt; and the blogging option in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flock.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Flock&lt;/a&gt;, so this might be as good an opportunity to do so as any.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, John. I don&#8217;t expect internet access this weekend, and the AHA usually hasn&#8217;t had wireless available (though they have a room set aside for internet access.)</p>
<p>I tend to hand-code my blog posts in TextMate before I put them in WordPress. Very inefficient. I&#8217;ve been meaning to try <a href="http://ranchero.com/marsedit/" rel="nofollow">MarsEdit</a> and the blogging option in <a href="http://www.flock.com" rel="nofollow">Flock</a>, so this might be as good an opportunity to do so as any.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Russell</title>
		<link>http://clioweb.org/2006/10/25/blogging-conference-sessions/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>John Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 01:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clioweb.org/archive/2006/10/25/blogging-conference-sessions/#comment-325</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t count on Internet access being reliable (or freely available), so having some kind of offline blogging software is useful.  Here&#039;s a list of weblog clients: &lt;a href=&quot;http://codex.wordpress.org/Weblog_Client&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://codex.wordpress.org/Weblog_Client&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t count on Internet access being reliable (or freely available), so having some kind of offline blogging software is useful.  Here&#8217;s a list of weblog clients: <a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Weblog_Client" rel="nofollow">http://codex.wordpress.org/Weblog_Client</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

